![]() ![]() ![]() M2-9R max cart weight of 38 grams vs 35 grams for TK-950S. M2-9R doesn't allow direct DIN phono cable connection, while TK-950S does allow direct DIN connection Anti-skate: string (SME) vs dial (Jelco) M2-9R includes VTA on the fly knob, TK-950S requires 3rd party accessory for VTA on the fly (which I already own) KEY: M2-9R adjusts VTF using counterweight + outrigger vs TK-950S uses static counterweight + knob to adjust dynamic balance spring. KEY: M2-9R uses gimbal bearings vs combo of static knife-edge + dynamic balance on the TK-950S. TK-950S should work with my existing arm board (mounting distance is the same as SA-750D, although overhang differs). M2-9R requires new arm board (~$180), but gain that sliding SME base dohickey. Effective mass of M2-9R is 4 grams less, making it a *slightly* better match (like 1 Hz better), for my MP-500 and some MCs I'm considering buying, if compliance numbers and calculators are to be believed. Price is close enough between the two that I won't be deciding based upon cost. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |